Sheraden v. Black

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• findings supported by substantial evidence are liberally interpreted in support of the judgment
• “There is no standard fixed by law for measuring the value of pain and suffering; rather, the amount to be awarded is left to the fact finder’s judgment.”
• “There is no standard fixed by law for measuring the value of pain and suffering; rather, the amount to be awarded is left to the fact finder’s judgment.”
• “There is no standard fixed by law for measuring the value of pain and suffering; rather, the amount to be awarded is left to the fact finder’s judgment.”
• “It is well settled in New Mexico that the function of a reviewing court on appeal is to correct erroneous results, not to correct errors that, even if corrected, would not change the result.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).