Skip to main content

Moore v. State

Citations

  • 698 N.E.2d 1203
  • 1998 Ind. App. LEXIS 1225
  • 1998 WL 414634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In light of the well-settled prohibition against convictions for both a greater offense and its included offense, if a Wright analysis determines that crime ‘B’ is an included offense of crime ‘A’, then double jeopardy precludes convictions for both.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Kirsch, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.