Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 10/8/1987
Moore v. State
Citations
- 531 A.2d 1026
- 72 Md. App. 524
- 1987 Md. App. LEXIS 389
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding the possibility of an enhanced sentence is a collateral consequence
- enhanced sentence for subsequent convictions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Submitted Before Weant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- City of Ottawa v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1991-11-27· cited 25×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-29· cited 18×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-09-26· cited 7×
- State v. DENISYUKCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-29· cited 6×
- Pitt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-04-09· cited 4×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Joseph F. Cuthrell v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionFourth Circuit· 1973-04-06· cited 222×
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-01-09· cited 39×
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-05-09· cited 24×
- Daley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-02-06· cited 23×
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-02-04· cited 12×
- Smith v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-09-08· cited 10×
- Durbin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-07· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.