Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 12/29/2010
Miller v. State
Citations
- 196 Md. App. 658
- 11 A.3d 340
- 2010 Md. App. LEXIS 191
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Due Process does not require that a defendant be advised of the indirect or collateral consequences of a guilty plea, even if the consequences are foreseeable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moylan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. OrocioThird Circuit· 2011-06-29· cited 132×
- Commonwealth v. ClarkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2011-06-17· cited 115×
- Barrios-Cruz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-10· cited 68×
- Denisyuk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-25· cited 40×
- Sam Yonga v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-01-28· cited 23×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-25· cited 17×
- Graves v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-12-18· cited 17×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-09-26· cited 7×
- State v. CASTELLON-GUTIERREZCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-04-29· cited 4×
- McCloud v. Department of State PoliceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-06· cited 3×
- Guardado v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-27· cited 3×
- United States v. ChapaN.D. Georgia· 2011-07-12
- State of Arizona v. Gerardo PobleteCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-07-28
- Yonga v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-01-28
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court· 2010-03-31· cited 5,017×
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court· 1985-03-18· cited 3,068×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court· 2001-06-25· cited 2,984×
- United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court· 1979-05-21· cited 1,059×
- MacKey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 945×
- Solem v. StumesSupreme Court· 1984-02-29· cited 584×
- Allen v. HardySupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 521×
- Joseph F. Cuthrell v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionFourth Circuit· 1973-04-06· cited 222×
- Calcano-Martinez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court· 2001-06-25· cited 204×
- In Re ResendizCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-04-02· cited 164×
- United States v. Ivania Maria Couto, Also Known as Sealed Dft 35Second Circuit· 2002-11-15· cited 161×
- United States v. Monica Joyce CampbellEleventh Circuit· 1985-12-23· cited 152×
- United States v. Kwok Chee Kwan, AKA Jeff KwanNinth Circuit· 2005-05-12· cited 146×
- United States v. BandaFifth Circuit· 1993-09-07· cited 120×
- United States v. GonzalezFirst Circuit· 2000-01-25· cited 117×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.