Skip to main content
· 11/27/1991

City of Ottawa v. Lester

Citations

  • 822 P.2d 72
  • 16 Kan. App. 2d 244
  • 1991 Kan. App. LEXIS 950

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the suspension of driving privileges is a collateral consequence to the defendant's guilty plea and that the statutes governing municipal courts do not require a court to advise the defendant of the collateral consequences of a plea
  • petitioner's PCR action seeking withdrawal of guilty plea in prior DUI case was not moot because should petitioner prevail in his PCR action, it could impact potential penalties in any subsequent prosecution
  • petitioner’s PCR action seeking withdrawal of guilty plea in prior DUI case was not moot because should petitioner prevail in his PCR action, it could impact potential penalties in any subsequent prosecution
  • due process does not require a criminal defendant to be informed of the possibility that a conviction as the result of a plea may be used to enhance the sentence for a later crime
  • possible suspension of driving privileges was a collateral consequence
  • possible suspension of driving privileges collateral consequence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Gernon, Sieve

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.