Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 130 S.W.3d 519
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 2832
  • 2004 WL 625630

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel’s unsworn letter brief asserting that he timely mailed motion for new trial was sufficient to prove timeliness of motion and thus extend time for filing notice of appeal; notice of appeal was therefore timely
  • holding that counsel = s unsworn letter brief asserting that he timely mailed motion for new trial was sufficient to prove timeliness of motion and thus extend time for filing notice of appeal; notice of appeal was therefore timely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whittington, Lang, Lang-Miers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.