Moore v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is apparent that neither the 401(k) contribution nor the health savings account qualifies as an authorized deduction for calculation of net income under section 61.30(3), Florida Statutes (2011).”
• “It is unclear whether this additional available income would have affected the final judgment; however, we are bound to remand for reconsideration of the judgment in light of the correct net income of Former Wife.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Edge v. Edge
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-06-15

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chappell v. Chappell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-10-13· cited 19×
• Geoghegan v. Geoghegan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-16· cited 13×
• Glaeser v. Glaeser
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-09· cited 5×