Chappell v. Chappell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the general test used to determine whether to allow a set off is whether the party receiving the funds had the unrestricted right to determine how they were spent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Epstein v. Epstein
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-21· cited 12×
• Servies v. Servies
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-10· cited 9×
• Waldman v. Waldman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-26· cited 7×
• Roberts v. Roberts
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1997-06-25· cited 7×
• Goldin v. Goldin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-05-24· cited 6×
• Hubshman v. Hubshman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-01-23· cited 6×
• Filaretou v. Filaretou
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-05· cited 5×
• Glaeser v. Glaeser
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-09· cited 5×
• Lafferty v. Lafferty
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-03-28· cited 5×
• Marlowe v. Marlowe
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-31· cited 3×
• Smith v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-09· cited 2×
• In Re Harloff
  M.D. Florida· 2002-10-28· cited 1×
• Moore v. Moore
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-23· cited 1×
• Rankin v. Rankin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-11-14· cited 1×
• Bock v. Bock
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-08-20· cited 1×
• Attorney General of Florida ex rel. State v. D'Agosto
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-04-12· cited 1×
• Gonzalez v. Gonzalez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-02-04
• Rosen v. Rosen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-01-04

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. Williams
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-06-11· cited 43×
• Lopez v. Lopez
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1956-11-07· cited 37×
• Mixson v. Mixson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-12-18· cited 31×
• Langbein v. Comerford
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-11-20· cited 17×
• Ryan v. Ryan
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1960-09-15· cited 14×
• Gordon v. Gordon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-12-06· cited 14×
• Murchison v. Murchison
  California Court of Appeal· 1963-08-27· cited 14×
• Zaragoza v. Zaragoza
  California Court of Appeal· 1941-11-25· cited 12×
• Van Diest v. Van Diest
  California Court of Appeal· 1968-10-16· cited 11×
• Chord v. Chord
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-04-23· cited 9×
• Naster v. Naster
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1964-04-08· cited 9×
• Van Morkhoven v. Kleiner
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1965-11-30· cited 3×
• Palmer v. Palmer
  New York Supreme Court· 1966-12-16· cited 2×
• Purcell v. Purcell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-06-05· cited 2×
• Miller v. Miller
  Civil Court of the City of New York· 1970-02-19· cited 1×
• Viser v. Viser
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1966-04-25· cited 1×