District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/7/2006
Moody v. State
Citations
- 931 So. 2d 177
- 2006 WL 1541249
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting writ to prevent retrial on charges on which defendant already had been acquitted because retrial would violate Double Jeopardy Clause
- trial court not permitted under double jeopardy prohibition and Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.640(a) to retry defendant on greater charge where jury returned verdict for lesser-included offense and appellate court ruled “jury taint” required new trial only on lesser-included charge
- trial court not permitted under double jeopardy prohibition and Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.640(a) to retry defendant on greater charge where jury returned verdict for lesser-included offense and appellate court ruled \jury taint\ required new trial only on lesser-included charge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Northcutt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ex Parte GillentineSupreme Court of Alabama· 2007-09-06· cited 8×
- Clinton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-14· cited 7×
- Middleton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-23· cited 6×
- Ex Parte McCombsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2009-05-15· cited 3×
- Middleton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-02-07· cited 3×
- State v. HamiltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-02-22· cited 1×
- Dodge v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-07-27
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 2,314×
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 1,038×
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 873×
- Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-03-19· cited 557×
- Mahaun v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-12-13· cited 92×
- United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Paul D. Wood, and Cross-AppellantTenth Circuit· 1992-03-17· cited 67×
- Marshall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-06-12· cited 52×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles H. KEATING, Jr., Charles H. Keating, III, Defendants-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1998-06-09· cited 51×
- Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-11-16· cited 49×
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-05-30· cited 47×
- Moody v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-01-23· cited 46×
- State v. GoodleySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1982-11-29· cited 37×
- State v. ConnellySupreme Court of Florida· 1999-08-19· cited 28×
- Powell v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-01-19· cited 23×
- United States v. Hector Gerardo Gutierrez-ZamaranoNinth Circuit· 1994-04-26· cited 18×
- State v. LangleyLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2004-12-29· cited 18×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-02-19· cited 12×
- Sayan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-03-26· cited 9×
- Chapman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-12-01· cited 8×
- State v. NormanLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2001-10-31· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.