Middleton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that for double jeopardy purposes, a jury verdict convicting a defendant of a lesser included offense impliedly acquits the defendant of the greater offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• RONNIE TRAVIS KRUSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-07-12· cited 6×
• Welch v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-04-13· cited 5×
• MUSTAFA A. ABDULLA v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-07-05· cited 2×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Benton v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
• Green v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,075×
• United States v. Ball
  Supreme Court· 1896-05-25· cited 1,376×
• Ohio v. Johnson
  Supreme Court· 1984-08-02· cited 1,064×
• Sanabria v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 1,038×
• Fong Foo v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1962-03-19· cited 557×
• Morris v. Mathews
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-21· cited 145×
• State v. Griffith
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-03-29· cited 44×
• State v. Langley
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2007-05-22· cited 42×
• State v. Langley
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2004-12-29· cited 18×
• Plate v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1996-11-08· cited 12×
• Moody v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-07· cited 8×
• Ex Parte Gillentine
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2007-09-06· cited 8×
• Middleton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-23· cited 6×
• Middleton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-13· cited 3×