Skip to main content

Montgomery v. State

Citations

  • 878 N.E.2d 262
  • 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 2742
  • 2007 WL 4338749

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • giving a term its “common and ordinary meaning” despite it being defined in other sections of the Indiana Code
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing habitual offender enhancement in light of Montgomery’s criminal history
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing maximum habitual offender enhancement in light of Montgomery’s criminal history
  • where defendant never attempted to appeal validity of probation condition when it was imposed, his challenge to its validity several years later, after he was alleged to have violated it, was an impermissible collateral attack on a final judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaidik, Baker, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.