Idaho Supreme Court· 4/2/2009

Montgomery v. Montgomery

Citations

205 P.3d 650
147 Idaho 1
2009 Ida. LEXIS 49

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to rule on the admissibility of certain evidence prior to granting summary judgment
noting the “well-established rule that a trial court, in ruling on a motion for summary judgment, is not to weigh evidence or resolve controverted factual issues.”
noting the “well-established rule that a trial court, in ruling on a motion for summary judgment, is not to weigh evidence or resolve controverted factual issues.”
stating appellate court’s role is to note error and remand for appropriate findings
applying I.R.E. 803(3) in lieu of a statute governing admission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horton, Burdick, Jones, Kidwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.