Skip to main content
· 6/3/2002

Bolger v. Lance

Citations

  • 53 P.3d 1211
  • 137 Idaho 792
  • 2002 Ida. LEXIS 75

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Attorney General was a “law enforcement agency” under the Public Records Act
  • “A trial court’s findings of fact will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, which is to say that findings that are based upon substantial and competent, although conflicting, evidence will not be disturbed on appeal.”
  • by prefacing statute with the phrase “notwithstanding any statute or rule of court to the contrary,” the “legislature made it absolutely clear that the provisions of [the statute] are to control over any contrary provisions” of existing law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kidwell, Trout, Schroeder, Walters, Eismann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.