Skip to main content
· 6/22/1995

Cathey v. Booth

Citations

  • 900 S.W.2d 339
  • 38 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 927
  • 1995 Tex. LEXIS 107
  • 1995 WL 371176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant may establish right to summary judgment by pleading and conclusively establishing each element of affirmative defense, thereby defeating plaintiffs cause of action
  • holding movant is entitled to summary judgment when it proves that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
  • stating that a defendant “who conclusively establishes all of the elements of an affirmative defense is entitled to summary judgment.”
  • holding in medical-malpractice case that county hospital did not 6 Dep’t of Criminal Justice v. Simons, 140 S.W.3d 338, 343–48 (Tex. 2004)
  • explaining that the purpose of the TTCA’s notice requirements is to allow “governmental units to gather information necessary to guard against unfounded claims, settle claims, and prepare for trial”
  • making above-referenced disposition mandatory, with certain exceptions inapplicable here, if error affecting part of controversy is separable without unfairness to parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.