· 6/22/1995
Cathey v. Booth
Citations
- 900 S.W.2d 339
- 38 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 927
- 1995 Tex. LEXIS 107
- 1995 WL 371176
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant may establish right to summary judgment by pleading and conclusively establishing each element of affirmative defense, thereby defeating plaintiffs cause of action
- holding movant is entitled to summary judgment when it proves that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
- stating that a defendant “who conclusively establishes all of the elements of an affirmative defense is entitled to summary judgment.”
- holding in medical-malpractice case that county hospital did not 6 Dep’t of Criminal Justice v. Simons, 140 S.W.3d 338, 343–48 (Tex. 2004)
- explaining that the purpose of the TTCA’s notice requirements is to allow “governmental units to gather information necessary to guard against unfounded claims, settle claims, and prepare for trial”
- making above-referenced disposition mandatory, with certain exceptions inapplicable here, if error affecting part of controversy is separable without unfairness to parties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.