Blandenburg v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “excited utterances are admissible because the circumstances under which such statements are made provide certain guarantees against ‘conscious misrepresentation’” (quoting Rogers, 660 So.2d at 240)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).