Skip to main content
· 4/7/2009

Mohammadi v. Scharfen

Citations

  • 609 F. Supp. 2d 14
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30320
  • 2009 WL 919925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding transferee court \had a substantial interest in the resolution of claims\ where plaintiff resided in that district, had been fingerprinted and interviewed there, and his application for naturalization would be adjudicated there
  • holding transferee court “had a substantial interest in the resolution of claims” where plaintiff resided in that district, had been fingerprinted and interviewed there, and his application for naturalization would be adjudicated there
  • “The convenience of the witnesses ‘is considered only to the extent that the witnesses may actually be unavailable for trial in one of the fora.’”
  • “In light of the transfer, the court does not address the defendants’ motion to dismiss.”
  • “because the plaintiffs claims are based on federal law, the court recognizes ‘the principle that the transferee federal court is competent to decide federal issues correctly’ ”
  • “because the plaintiff’s claims are based on federal law, the court recognizes ‘the principle that the transferee federal court is competent to decide federal issues correctly’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ricardo M. Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.