· 4/7/2009
Mohammadi v. Scharfen
Citations
- 609 F. Supp. 2d 14
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30320
- 2009 WL 919925
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding transferee court \had a substantial interest in the resolution of claims\ where plaintiff resided in that district, had been fingerprinted and interviewed there, and his application for naturalization would be adjudicated there
- holding transferee court “had a substantial interest in the resolution of claims” where plaintiff resided in that district, had been fingerprinted and interviewed there, and his application for naturalization would be adjudicated there
- “The convenience of the witnesses ‘is considered only to the extent that the witnesses may actually be unavailable for trial in one of the fora.’”
- “In light of the transfer, the court does not address the defendants’ motion to dismiss.”
- “because the plaintiffs claims are based on federal law, the court recognizes ‘the principle that the transferee federal court is competent to decide federal issues correctly’ ”
- “because the plaintiff’s claims are based on federal law, the court recognizes ‘the principle that the transferee federal court is competent to decide federal issues correctly’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ricardo M. Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.