· 7/21/2006
FC INVESTMENT GROUP LC v. Lichtenstein
Citations
- 441 F. Supp. 2d 3
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49936
- 2006 WL 2037355
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the defendant must also show that the court will have difficulty applying another jurisdiction’s law
- finding that telephone conversations inducing reliance “were a significant part of the sequence of events underlying” a fraud claim
- explaining that the defendant must also show that the court will have difficulty applying another jurisdiction’s law
- “When analyzing the convenience of parties and witnesses, a defendant must show that witnesses would be unwilling to testify in the [transferor district].”
- “transactions by telephone and facsimile alone can, depending on the circumstances, be an adequate basis for personal jurisdiction”
- “[t]ransactions by telephone and facsimile alone can, depending on the circumstances, be an adequate basis for personal jurisdiction”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Collyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.