Skip to main content
· 7/21/2006

FC INVESTMENT GROUP LC v. Lichtenstein

Citations

  • 441 F. Supp. 2d 3
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49936
  • 2006 WL 2037355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the defendant must also show that the court will have difficulty applying another jurisdiction’s law
  • finding that telephone conversations inducing reliance “were a significant part of the sequence of events underlying” a fraud claim
  • explaining that the defendant must also show that the court will have difficulty applying another jurisdiction’s law
  • “When analyzing the convenience of parties and witnesses, a defendant must show that witnesses would be unwilling to testify in the [transferor district].”
  • “transactions by telephone and facsimile alone can, depending on the circumstances, be an adequate basis for personal jurisdiction”
  • “[t]ransactions by telephone and facsimile alone can, depending on the circumstances, be an adequate basis for personal jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Collyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.