Skip to main content
· 2/17/2009

Aftab v. Gonzalez

Citations

  • 597 F. Supp. 2d 76
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11761
  • 2009 WL 368660

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “transferee district is presumed to be equally familiar with the federal laws governing [plaintiffs] claims” and that the difference in the forum’s calendars “is relatively minor”
  • observing that transfer may be proper where there is no allegation that USCIS officials 5 in Washington, D.C. “were personally involved with the processing or adjudication of [plaintiff’s] application”
  • explaining that courts use their “broad discretion to balance” these factors
  • explaining that courts use their “broad discretion to balance” these factors
  • stating that courts use their “broad discretion to balance” these factors
  • explaining that courts use their “broad discretion to balance” these factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard W. Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.