Mohammad Hussain v. Keisler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court lacked jurisdiction under § 1252(g) to consider challenge that removal proceedings were unconstitutionally commenced against plaintiff based on his ethnicity and religion
• “Section 1252(a)(2)(D) plainly states that other limitations on judicial review in ‘this section’—that is, 4 No. 07-2611 section 1252—still apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).