Skip to main content
· 12/19/2006

Nahar Said Dababneh v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States

Citations

  • 471 F.3d 806
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the requirement that a Notice to Appear state a time and place of the removal hearing may be met with two documents
  • holding that the requirement that a Notice to Appear state a time and place of the removal hear- ing may be met with two documents
  • holding that the immigration judge is not deprived of jurisdiction when the \two-step\ procedure is used
  • stating petitioner’s claim was not one challenging commencement of proceedings subject to § 1252(g), but was rather a challenge to whether notice was defective and was thus reviewable as pure question of law
  • “DHS frequently serves [notices to appear] where there is no immediate access to docketing information.”
  • that the government fulfilled its obligations under 8 U.S.C. § 1229 in two documents rather than one did not deprive the immigration judge of jurisdiction to initiate removal proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Posner, Flaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.