M.J.S. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he legislature does not consider vehicles for construction use to be ‘motor vehicles’ as they have assigned such vehicles to a ‘special’ category.”
• state’s failure to establish that baekhoe is “conveyance” required reversal of conviction for trespass in a conveyance
• construction backhoe is not a motor vehicles, as defined by Florida law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Harding v. Allen-Laux, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-04· cited 10×
• CRANE RENTAL OF ORLANDO v. Hausman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-31· cited 7×
• State v. STRECK
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-04-22· cited 6×
• Newton v. Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-12-14· cited 1×
• MJS v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-08-01
• State of Arizona v. Orvie Rowland Streck
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-04-22
• A. M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-30
• Volker Stevin Construction, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.
  S.D. Florida· 1987-11-30

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Montanez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-11-07· cited 4×