Harding v. Allen-Laux, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a forklift that was often operated along the edge of a state road was a dangerous instrumentality under the facts of the case
• holding that a forklift is a dangerous instrumentality even though it is not statutorily a motor vehicle
• holding that a forklift is a dangerous instrumentality even though it is not statutorily a motor vehicle
• holding that a forklift that was often operated along the edge of a state road was a dangerous instrumentality under the facts of the case
• holding that, although it does not meet the statutory definition of a motor vehicle, a forklift is a dangerous instrumentality
• holding that a forklift is a dangerous instrumentality where it was involved in a collision with an automobile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).