Skip to main content
· 12/31/1987

CRANE RENTAL OF ORLANDO v. Hausman

Citations

  • 518 So. 2d 395
  • 13 Fla. L. Weekly 125
  • 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11816
  • 1987 WL 29156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a self-propelled crane is not a motor vehicle for purposes of the registration statute
  • noting “despite the fact that an uninsured motorist stands in a tort relationship to the company, the action arises out of an insurance contract between the parties. Therefore ... the five-year limitation period specified by section 95.11(2)(b) [applies]”
  • self-propelled crane designed as one unit, purchased as such, and used as a complete integrated unit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orfinger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.