District of Columbia· 9/5/1989
Mix v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.
Citations
- 720 F. Supp. 8
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10553
- 1989 WL 102629
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding section 12(2) restricted to initial distributions absent clear congressional mandate to read section 12(2) expansively
- holding section 12(2) restricted to initial distributions absent clear congressional mandate to read section 12(2) expansively
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas F. Hogan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co.Third Circuit· 1990-05-09· cited 384×
- Ballay v. Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc.Third Circuit· 1991-02-15· cited 85×
- In Re AES Corp. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 1993-06-25· cited 68×
- Pompano-Windy City Partners, Ltd. v. Bear Stearns & Co.S.D. New York· 1992-06-04· cited 42×
- Anheuser-Busch Companies v. Summit Coffee Co.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1993-06-09· cited 42×
- Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. KapoorN.D. Illinois· 1993-02-10· cited 30×
- Farley v. Baird, Patrick & Co., Inc.S.D. New York· 1990-11-19· cited 25×
- Bank of Denver v. Southeastern Capital Group, Inc.D. Colorado· 1991-05-09· cited 23×
- Cox v. EichlerN.D. California· 1990-10-25· cited 18×
- Kaplan v. PomerantzN.D. Illinois· 1990-05-22· cited 15×
- Bennett v. Bally Manufacturing Corp.D. South Carolina· 1992-02-13· cited 13×
- Featherston v. District of Columbia Superior CourtDistrict of Columbia· 2012-01-17· cited 13×
- T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund, Inc. v. PreletzD. Maryland· 1990-10-22· cited 12×
- Newman v. Comprehensive Care Corp.D. Oregon· 1992-04-22· cited 9×
- Reed v. Prudential Securities Inc.S.D. Texas· 1995-02-03· cited 7×
- Grinsell v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.N.D. California· 1990-08-31· cited 6×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1991-03-21
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 784×
- United States v. NaftalinSupreme Court· 1979-05-21· cited 327×
- Abell v. Potomac Insurance CompanyFifth Circuit· 1988-12-14· cited 176×
- Gross v. Diversified Mortgage InvestorsS.D. New York· 1977-02-25· cited 115×
- Capri v. MurphySecond Circuit· 1988-08-31· cited 67×
- Klein v. Computer Devices, Inc.S.D. New York· 1984-06-28· cited 49×
- Bresson v. Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc.S.D. New York· 1986-07-22· cited 48×
- Leonard v. Shearson Lehman/American Express Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-05-16· cited 43×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,932 Philip Gutter, Cross-Appellee v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., CrossSixth Circuit· 1981-05-15· cited 38×
- Elysian Federal Savings Bank v. First Interregional Equity Corp.D. New Jersey· 1989-05-11· cited 31×
- SSH Co., Ltd. v. Shearson Lehman Bros. Inc.S.D. New York· 1987-12-24· cited 31×
- First Union Brokerage v. MilosS.D. Florida· 1989-05-12· cited 25×
- Panek v. BoguczD. New Jersey· 1989-05-10· cited 18×
- Wilko v. SwanS.D. New York· 1955-01-11· cited 15×
- Ralph v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.S.D. Florida· 1988-08-01· cited 14×
- Strong v. Paine Webber, Inc.S.D. New York· 1988-10-12· cited 12×
- Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. CullatherE.D. Virginia· 1987-08-05· cited 8×
- Scotch v. Moseley, Hallgarten, Estabrook & Weeden, Inc.M.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-12-13· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.