· 10/25/1990
Cox v. Eichler
Citations
- 765 F. Supp. 601
- 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15230
- 1990 WL 300286
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The undersigned recognizes the right of a plaintiff to plead in the alternative but does not believe that Plaintiffs can use this device to circumvent ERISA preemption.”
- “[P]laintiffs may not assert preempted state law claims, even in the alternative; if ERISA operates to preempt plaintiffs’ state law claims, preemption is mandatory.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Patel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.