Skip to main content
· 10/25/1990

Cox v. Eichler

Citations

  • 765 F. Supp. 601
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15230
  • 1990 WL 300286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The undersigned recognizes the right of a plaintiff to plead in the alternative but does not believe that Plaintiffs can use this device to circumvent ERISA preemption.”
  • “[P]laintiffs may not assert preempted state law claims, even in the alternative; if ERISA operates to preempt plaintiffs’ state law claims, preemption is mandatory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.