District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 5/19/1992
Mitchell v. United States
Citations
- 609 A.2d 1099
- 1992 D.C. App. LEXIS 139
- 1992 WL 110315
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that defense was not entitled to independent psychiatric examination when trial court offered preliminary option of forensic screening to determine whether grounds existed for such examination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Chief Judge, and Schwelb and King, Associate Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-08-31· cited 34×
- Freeland v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-09-10· cited 26×
- Pierce v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-12-30· cited 16×
- Skyers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-01-26· cited 14×
- Murray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-08-12· cited 10×
- Hammon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-05-15· cited 9×
- Edwards v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-02-15· cited 7×
- Whitaker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-11-10· cited 6×
- Jacobs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-03-09
Cites
49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 2,425×
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1964-02-13· cited 860×
- Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-05-17· cited 220×
- Thompson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-08-11· cited 172×
- John L. Bailey v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-03-07· cited 136×
- Toliver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-10-31· cited 107×
- Commonwealth v. BaconMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-10-16· cited 106×
- State v. EppersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1985-07-26· cited 102×
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-04-28· cited 89×
- Sherer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-09-30· cited 84×
- Phillip Coltrane v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-10-10· cited 83×
- United States v. Johnnie MasthersD.C. Circuit· 1976-06-15· cited 67×
- Duhart v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-04-03· cited 67×
- Grimes v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-11-26· cited 66×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.