DC· 10/31/1983
Toliver v. United States
Citations
- 468 A.2d 958
- 1983 D.C. App. LEXIS 523
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evidence of defendant’s drug sales admissible in trial for possession, but not sale, of heroin
- evidence of defendant's drug sales admissible in trial for possession, but not sale, of heroin
- “inextricably intertwined” evidence directly admissible without the necessity of cautionary Drew instruction.
- \inextricably intertwined\ evidence directly admissible without the necessity of cautionary Drew instruction.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kern, Nebeker, Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.