District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 10/31/1983

Toliver v. United States

Citations

468 A.2d 958
1983 D.C. App. LEXIS 523

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

evidence of defendant’s drug sales admissible in trial for possession, but not sale, of heroin
evidence of defendant's drug sales admissible in trial for possession, but not sale, of heroin
“inextricably intertwined” evidence directly admissible without the necessity of cautionary Drew instruction.
\inextricably intertwined\ evidence directly admissible without the necessity of cautionary Drew instruction.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kern, Nebeker, Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Other cases named Toliver v. United States

14 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.