Skip to main content
DC· 10/31/1983

Toliver v. United States

Citations

  • 468 A.2d 958
  • 1983 D.C. App. LEXIS 523

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence of defendant’s drug sales admissible in trial for possession, but not sale, of heroin
  • evidence of defendant's drug sales admissible in trial for possession, but not sale, of heroin
  • “inextricably intertwined” evidence directly admissible without the necessity of cautionary Drew instruction.
  • \inextricably intertwined\ evidence directly admissible without the necessity of cautionary Drew instruction.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kern, Nebeker, Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.