Skip to main content

Mitchell v. State

Citations

  • 337 Md. 509
  • 654 A.2d 1309
  • 1995 Md. LEXIS 28

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a new trial was the appropriate remedy where the trial court failed to conduct a proper Rule 4-215(d) inquiry
  • noting that the trial court must make “ ‘such an inquiry as is required to permit it to exercise the discretion required by the [R]ule’ ” (quoting Moore v. State, 331 Md. 179, 187, 626 A.2d 968, 972 (1993))
  • pointing out that the real key to determining the propriety of the limited remand is “whether the error adversely affected the defendant’s right to a fair trial”
  • pointing out that the real key to determining the propriety of the limited remand is \whether the error adversely affected the defendant's right to a fair trial\
  • insufficient inquiry regarding reason for appearing without counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Karwacki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.