Indiana Supreme Court· 12/15/1995
Mitchell v. State
Citations
- 659 N.E.2d 112
- 1995 Ind. LEXIS 188
- 1995 WL 739872
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statute bears rational relationship to legitimate state interest in punishing and deterring lawbreaking
- statute bears rational relationship to legitimate state interest in punishing and deterring lawbreaking
- “the General Assembly may have concluded that denying the privilege of driving and the privilege of using the public roads to those likely to deal in controlled substances ... is an effective means for deterring criminal conduct.”
- procedural and substantive due process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Debruler, Shepard, Selby, Dickson, Sullivan, Process
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Adams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2012-02-02· cited 64×
- Parks v. Madison CountyIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-12-31· cited 41×
- Marlett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-12-28· cited 27×
- Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Jennifer M. GurtnerIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-02-26· cited 21×
- Leone v. COM'R, BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLESIndiana Supreme Court· 2010-09-10· cited 18×
- Indianapolis Historic Partners v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court· 1998-04-23· cited 17×
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa· 1997-12-24· cited 11×
- Ben-Yisrayl v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-07-10· cited 11×
- Walker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-02-21· cited 9×
- Lane v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-04-17· cited 9×
- Jenkins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-03-27· cited 9×
- Gibson v. Indiana Department of CorrectionIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-12-29· cited 8×
- Dixon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-09-16· cited 8×
- Parrett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-12-18· cited 5×
- Jefferson Smurfit Corp. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court· 1997-06-20· cited 5×
- Sublett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-10-13· cited 4×
- State v. RayIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-05-09· cited 4×
- Cosby v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-11-27· cited 3×
- Bellamy v. GillisIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-01-31· cited 3×
- Molly A. Melton v. Indiana Athletic Trainers Board, David Craig, A.T., in his official and individual capacity, Larry Leverenz, A.T., in his official and individual capacityIndiana Court of Appeals· 2016-04-27· cited 3×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 5,581×
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,329×
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1923-06-04· cited 3,363×
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court· 1971-05-24· cited 2,202×
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1905-04-17· cited 1,236×
- Bowers v. HardwickSupreme Court· 1986-09-11· cited 953×
- Clark v. JeterSupreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 679×
- Wilson v. Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Supreme Court· 1979-02-08· cited 77×
- Reffett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-05-17· cited 55×
- Bedwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-08-19· cited 43×
- State v. PalmerIndiana Supreme Court· 1979-03-22· cited 36×
- Morgan County Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court· 1973-11-02· cited 17×
- Morgan County REMC v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court· 1973-03-13· cited 16×
- Maher v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1993-04-22· cited 7×
- Palmer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-01-30· cited 3×
- Mitchell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-08-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.