Skip to main content
· 6/20/1997

Jefferson Smurfit Corp. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue

Citations

  • 681 N.E.2d 806
  • 1997 Ind. Tax LEXIS 10
  • 1997 WL 338436

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addition of comma after word “servicing” and “the” before word “enameling” in recodified statute, Ind.Code Ann. § 6-2.1-2-l(c)(l)(D), was grammatical and not substantive in light of savings clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.