Indiana Court of Appeals· 9/16/1997
Dixon v. State
Citations
- 685 N.E.2d 715
- 1997 Ind. App. LEXIS 1267
- 1997 WL 575314
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that, in home detention, a defendant’s movements are generally limited to travel to and from work and are supervised by the trial court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sharpnack, Najam, Rucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-04-29· cited 44×
- Lieberenz v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-10-27· cited 22×
- Cody R. Hickman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2017-08-01· cited 9×
- Hancock v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-11-29· cited 7×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2011-11-22· cited 6×
- Oswalt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-06-04· cited 5×
- State v. BarkdullIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-03-31· cited 2×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barany v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-11-16· cited 155×
- Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-12-28· cited 75×
- Dunn v. JenkinsIndiana Supreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 51×
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-08-31· cited 50×
- Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-12-15· cited 28×
- Schrefler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-01-18· cited 25×
- Capes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.