Skip to main content

Mitchell v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 62 Mass. App. Ct. 769
  • 821 N.E.2d 79
  • 2005 Mass. App. LEXIS 36

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining and distinguishing standard for deciding motion to vacate retroactively on ground of newly discovered evidence with standard for deciding motion for relief from prospective application of abuse prevention order issued under c. 209A
  • proper to extend order set to expire upon showing of “continued need” without showing of new abuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duefly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.