Brossard v. West Roxbury Division of the District Court Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting pro se litigants are not excused from complying with rules of appellate procedure
• \emotional relationship which entailed substantially more than a few casual dates\ amounted to \substantive dating relationship\
• that defendant referred to victim as \former girlfriend\ tended to prove they were in substantive dating relationship
• \emotional relationship which entailed substantially more than a few casual dates\ amounted to \substantive dating relationship\
• person may be in more than one “substantive dating relationship” at any given time
• General Laws c. 209A, § 1, does not \preclude the possibility of a [victim's] being in more than one 'substantive dating relationship' at any one time\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).