Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 2/28/2013

Mitchell v. Lyons Professional Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 708 F.3d 463
  • 2013 WL 709645
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4174
  • 117 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 770

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court is not required to exhaust alternative sanctions but must consider them
  • holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing an action where its “detailed scheduling order clearly stated that future noncompliance ... would be met with dismissal”
  • holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing an action where its “detailed scheduling order clearly stated that future noncompliance and tardiness would be met with dismissal”
  • holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing an action where its “detailed scheduling order clearly stated that future noncompliance and tardiness would be met with dismissal”
  • holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing an action where its “detailed scheduling order clearly stated that future noncompliance and tardiness would be met with dismissal”
  • holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing an action where its “detailed scheduling order clearly stated that future noncompliance and tardiness would be met with dismissal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winter, Raggi, Chin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Mitchell v. Lyons Professional Services, Inc.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.