Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 9/24/2014

Baptiste v. Sommers

Citations

  • 768 F.3d 212
  • 2014 WL 4723272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the Court had no reason to believe that the case at issue strained the docket in any unusual way despite a two-year stall
  • holding that sua sponte dismissal may be warranted “[i]f the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with [the] rules or a court order”
  • holding that sua sponte dismissal may be warranted “[i]f the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with [the] rules or a court order”
  • holding that sua sponte dismissal may be warranted “[i]f the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with [the] rules or a court order.”
  • holding that sua sponte dismissal may be warranted “[i]f the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with [the] rules or a court order”
  • holding that a district court’s dismissal was an abuse of discretion in part because plaintiff received inadequate notice and did not receive an opportunity to be heard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calabresi, Lynch, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Baptiste v. Sommers

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.