Skip to main content
· 7/18/1986

William C. Shea v. Donohoe Construction Co., Inc

Citations

  • 795 F.2d 1071
  • 254 U.S. App. D.C. 175
  • 6 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 301
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27073

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “repeated failure to attend status conferences” in that case did not constitute prejudice to the judicial system
  • explaining that “the court may order the guilty counsel to pay a designated amount to the other party to cover his costs and inconvenience”
  • noting that dismissal has been upheld where “the errant behavior has caused the other party severe prejudice in his ability to present his ease”
  • explaining that actual prejudice is required “where the delay is not ... unreasonably protracted”
  • noting that dismissal has been upheld where the “errant 7 The Court also cannot conclude that Defendants have been harmed by Plaintiff’s tardy disclosure of its computation of damages under Rule 26(a)(1)(iii
  • discussing factors influencing propriety of dismissal of civil action when plaintiff is unaware of attorney's neglect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wald, Buckley, Trade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.