Mitchell Energy Corp. v. Bartlett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parties are restricted on appeal to theory on which the case was tried
• holding that parties are restricted on appeal to theory on which the case was tried
• holding that parties are restricted on appeal to theory on which the case was tried
• holding that parties are restricted on appeal to theory on which the case was tried
• holding same limitations period applied to claims for personal injuries and property damage, as both were allegedly caused by same nuisance
• holding continuing-tort doctrine in applicable to landowners’ suit for nuisance, negligence, violation of agency rules, trespass, and fraud, alleging contamination to his groundwater from oil company’s wells, because injuries were permanent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).