Minton v. Sheet Metal Workers Local 54

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that opposite-sex surveillance of male inmates is constitutionally permissible because minimal intrusions on prisoner’s privacy were outweighed by institutional concerns for safety and equal employment opportunity
• a “staffing restriction does not violate Title VII” because “a minimal restriction such as the Unit 5 gender-based staffing restriction does not deprive female employees of any employment opportunities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Minton v. Sheet Metal Workers Local 54

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Minton v. Sheet Metal Workers Local 54
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-10