United States v. Paula Sneed, Norris Louis McGraw Patrick Johnson, and Sharon Ann Polley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to consider a defendant’s request for home confinement “because such requests are properly directed to the” BOP
• declining to consider a defendant’s request for home confinement “because such requests are properly directed to the” BOP
• declining to consider a defendant’s request for home confinement “because such requests are properly directed to the” BOP
• declining to consider a defendant’s request for home confinement “because such requests are properly directed to the” BOP
• declining to consider a defendant’s request for home confinement “because such requests are properly directed to the” BOP
• declining to consider a defendant’s request for home confinement “because such requests are properly directed to the” BOP and citing to 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c), which provides that the BOP has authority to “place a prisoner in home confinement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).