Ninth Circuit· 3/8/2018
Ming Dai v. Jefferson Sessions
Citations
- 884 F.3d 858
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the IJ had found that Kaur was “a convincing witness” with a “credible demeanor” and whose “testimony was detailed, consistent and plausible”
- noting that the BIA “also made no adverse credibility finding”
- noting the formal differences between a “petition for review” and an “appeal”
- “[W]e are required to treat a petitioner’s testimony as credible when the agency does not make an adverse credibility finding . . . .”
- “We think it not too much to ask of IJs and the BIA that they make an explicit adverse credibility finding”
- “The BIA acknowledged that the IJ did not make an adverse credibility finding and also did not make one itself.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cecilia Aguilar Fermin v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2020-05-05· cited 248×
- Emilia Velasquez-Gaspar v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2020-09-30· cited 176×
- Carla Davila v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2020-08-07· cited 175×
- Garland v. Ming DaiSupreme Court· 2021-06-01· cited 128×
- Chanpreet Kaur v. Robert WilkinsonNinth Circuit· 2021-01-29· cited 70×
- Ravinder Kaur v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2021-06-21· cited 37×
- East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2020-07-06· cited 20×
- E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. BarrN.D. California· 2019-07-24· cited 12×
- Ming Dai v. William P. BarrNinth Circuit· 2019-10-22· cited 3×
- East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2021-04-08
Cites
57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court· 1992-01-22· cited 8,324×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court· 2002-11-04· cited 3,361×
- Lydia Garcia-Milian v. Eric Holder, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2014-02-13· cited 941×
- BURBANOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1994-07-01· cited 746×
- Mario Ernesto Navas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 2000-06-20· cited 674×
- Gonzales v. ThomasSupreme Court· 2006-04-17· cited 486×
- Ukashu Nuru, AKA Ukasha Nuru v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2005-04-21· cited 461×
- Ren v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2011-08-19· cited 450×
- Tamang v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2010-03-16· cited 415×
- Kazemzadeh v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2009-08-06· cited 399×
- Tijani v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2010-03-11· cited 394×
- Jian Guo v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2004-03-23· cited 362×
- Roberto Antonio Aguilera-Cota v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1990-09-21· cited 333×
- Maryam Hartooni v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1994-04-07· cited 321×
- Abrahim Baballah Ula Baballah Ahmad Baballah v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2004-05-06· cited 311×
- Juan Mendoza Manimbao v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2003-05-20· cited 283×
- Cesar M. Lopez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2004-05-03· cited 274×
- Fouad Youssef Hakim Mansour v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Soheir Gamil Shaker Ewada v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2004-12-06· cited 256×
- Hongke Zhang v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2004-11-09· cited 254×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.