Ren v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plain language of the statute shows that the applicant was entitled to notice and an oppor- tunity to corroborate
• holding that a five-month continuance ensured “adequate 2 23-2160 notice” and “sufficient time” to respond
• concluding that a purported inconsistency did not support adverse credibility determination because the IJ’s characterization of the petitioner’s testimony was inaccurate
• holding that an IJ may require corroborative evidence, but must provide the applicant appropriate notice
• recognizing that “victims of abuse often confuse the details of particular incidents, including the time or dates of particular assaults”
• holding that IJ cannot deny application for asylum without first notifying applicant that proffered corroborating evidence is insufficient and providing applicant with opportunity to produce additional evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).