District of Columbia· 6/28/2005
Minebea Co., Ltd. v. Papst
Citations
- 374 F. Supp. 2d 231
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12547
- 2005 WL 1514424
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Rule 615 does not authorize the exclusion of a party who is a natural person or a designated representa tive of a party that is not a natural person.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Paul L. Friedman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-30· cited 1,182×
- United States v. SepulvedaFirst Circuit· 1993-12-20· cited 733×
- Perry v. LeekeSupreme Court· 1989-01-10· cited 478×
- Gene Miller v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1981-07-23· cited 212×
- United States v. RhynesFourth Circuit· 2000-02-03· cited 65×
- United States v. Patrick Rugiero (92-2412) Ara Basmajian (92-2414)Sixth Circuit· 1994-06-08· cited 60×
- Melvin Andre Taylor, AKA James A. Barker, AKA James Tate v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1967-12-19· cited 48×
- Opus 3 Limited v. Heritage Park, Incorporated, and Paul Stein, and James O'Brien David Kopp David J. Mislin John Does, Third PartyThird Circuit· 1996-07-23· cited 48×
- Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.D. Delaware· 1981-07-31· cited 48×
- United States v. Julio Ernesto Arias-SantanaFirst Circuit· 1992-06-04· cited 42×
- United States v. Clarence Gene Leggett, Alias Clarence Eugene Leggett Alias Gene LeggettFourth Circuit· 1964-01-07· cited 37×
- United States v. McLaughlinDistrict of Columbia· 1997-02-14· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.