District of Columbia· 8/17/2006
Minebea Co., Ltd. v. Papst
Citations
- 444 F. Supp. 2d 68
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58053
- 2006 WL 2374458
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the law of the forum because \[i]t would impose an 'extreme burden on the court' to conduct further independent research on the German law ...\
- applying the law of the forum because “[i]t would impose an ‘extreme burden on the court’ to conduct further independent research on the German law . . .”
- “The scope of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is defined in part by the justified expectations of the contracting parties. A party may breach the covenant by violating an implied term of the contract.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Paul L. Friedman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Estate of Botvin v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict of Columbia· 2012-07-03· cited 44×
- Campbell v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PaDistrict of Columbia· 2015-09-16· cited 38×
- Estate of Botvin Ex Rel. Ellis v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict of Columbia· 2011-03-25· cited 32×
- Regnante v. Securities & Exchange OfficialsS.D. New York· 2015-09-28· cited 25×
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2007-10-09· cited 24×
- In re Lidoderm Antitrust LitigationN.D. California· 2015-05-05· cited 12×
- Tolbert v. National Harmony Memorial ParkDistrict of Columbia· 2007-11-09· cited 11×
- In re Automotive Parts Antitrust LitigationE.D. Michigan· 2014-09-25· cited 9×
- Leibovitch v. Syrian Arab RepublicN.D. Illinois· 2014-03-31· cited 5×
- Valle v. Powertech Indus. Co.District of Columbia· 2019-04-01· cited 5×
- Hardy Exploration & Production (India), Inc. v. Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural GasDistrict of Columbia· 2016-11-30· cited 4×
- Richards v. Option One Mortgage Corp.District of Columbia· 2010-02-04· cited 3×
- Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.E.D. Kentucky· 2007-04-24· cited 2×
- Ellis v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict of Columbia· 2012-07-03
- Ellis v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict of Columbia· 2011-03-25
- Richards v. Option One Mortgage CorporationDistrict of Columbia· 2010-02-04
- Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2018-03-13
- Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation (No. Ii)- Mdl No. 2925District of Columbia· 2021-05-12
Cites
85 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 2,097×
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1983-03-29· cited 1,284×
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court· 1965-12-06· cited 902×
- 511 West 232nd Owners Corp. v. Jennifer Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals· 2002-06-11· cited 876×
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Federal Circuit· 1992-05-19· cited 585×
- Hobson v. WilsonD.C. Circuit· 1984-06-08· cited 501×
- Dalton v. Educational Testing ServiceNew York Court of Appeals· 1995-12-07· cited 463×
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court· 1961-04-17· cited 381×
- United States v. Masonite Corp.Supreme Court· 1942-05-11· cited 305×
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1998-09-30· cited 294×
- B. Braun Medical, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories and Np Medical, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsFederal Circuit· 1997-09-08· cited 280×
- Rowe v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1978-12-06· cited 257×
- United States v. Univis Lens Co.Supreme Court· 1942-05-11· cited 227×
- Kalisch-Jarcho, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals· 1983-03-29· cited 225×
- Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.Supreme Court· 2006-03-01· cited 216×
- Arrowhead Industrial Water, Inc. v. Ecolochem, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1988-05-06· cited 204×
- Bandag, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant. v. Al Bolser's Tire Stores, Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeFederal Circuit· 1984-11-08· cited 178×
- Oparaugo v. WattsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-10-06· cited 162×
- William Rothenberg v. Lincoln Farm Camp, Inc.Second Circuit· 1985-02-25· cited 159×
- Louise Drazan v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1985-05-20· cited 139×
Other cases named Minebea Co., Ltd. v. Papst
10 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Minebea Co., Ltd. v. PapstDistrict of Columbia· 1998-06-22· cited 13×
- MINEBEA CO., LTD. v. PapstDistrict of Columbia· 2005-06-29· cited 11×
- Minebea Co., Ltd. v. PapstDistrict of Columbia· 2005-02-04· cited 8×
- Minebea Co., Ltd. v. PapstDistrict of Columbia· 2005-06-28· cited 4×
- Minebea Co., Ltd. v. PapstDistrict of Columbia· 2005-06-24· cited 4×
- Minebea Co., Ltd. v. PapstDistrict of Columbia· 2005-06-06· cited 4×
- Minebea Co., Ltd. v. PapstDistrict of Columbia· 2002-11-06· cited 2×
- Minebea Co., Ltd. v. PapstDistrict of Columbia· 2005-05-13· cited 2×
- Minebea Co., Ltd. v. PapstDistrict of Columbia· 2005-02-04
- Minebea Co., Ltd. v. PapstDistrict of Columbia· 2005-06-06
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.