Oparaugo v. Watts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that publication was sufficiently alleged when plaintiff claimed that statements were published to “Nigerian authorities,” without providing any further detail
• explaining that “[p]oints not raised and preserved in the trial court [generally] will not be considered on appeal”
• noting that the defendants “made no serious challenge to the sufficiency of the allegations with respect to the element[] of falsity” (emphasis added)
• finding that publication was sufficiently alleged when plaintiff claimed that statements were published to “Nigerian authorities,” without providing any further detail
• noting that the defendants \made no serious challenge to the sufficiency of the allegations with respect to the element[ ] of falsity \ (emphasis added)
• noting that documents referenced in complaint and central to plaintiff’s claim can be considered in connection with motion to dismiss without converting the motion into one for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).