Miltiadous v. Tetervak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering the respondent’s and the children’s asylum status in the United States—the country to which the children were taken—as part of the habitual residence inquiry
• finding no abandonment where petitioner “was involved in the daily lives of the children,” “provided the children financial and overall support for their care,” and, after children were retained in U.S., continued to “pursue avenues to be reunited with his children”
• extensive physical and emotional abuse respondent suffered at the hands of petitioner created a grave risk for the child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).