Cathleen Carmen Mary Whiting v. Peter L. Krassner, A/K/A Mike Cimino Peter Krassner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the child was habitually resident in Canada even though the parents agreed the stay would be “of a limited duration”
• holding that a change in habitual residence had occurred because the parents had a written agreement that the child should reside in Canada, not New York, at the time the petition was filed
• holding that shared intent by parents that child live in Canada for period of two years fulfills Feder requirement that her move to Canada was accompanied by a degree of settled purpose
• explaining that acquiring a new habitual residence implicitly requires the abandonment of the prior habitual residence
• explaining that acquiring a new habitual residence implicitly requires the abandonment of the prior habitual residence
• claiming that the CBCA “believe[d] it lack[ed] subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal before it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).