E.D. Texas· 9/30/2008
Mills v. Warner-Lambert Co.
Citations
- 581 F. Supp. 2d 772
- 67 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 659
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89686
- 2008 WL 4488308
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[O]nly reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party can be drawn from the evidence.” (citing Eastman Kodak Co., 504 U.S. at 468 n.14)
- “[O]nly reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party can be drawn from the evidence.” (citing Eastman Kodak Co., 504 U.S. at 468 n.14)
- “[O]nly reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party can be drawn from the evidence.” (citing Eastman Kodak Co., 504 U.S. at 468 n.14)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thad Heartfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brooks v. Firestone Polymers, LLCE.D. Texas· 2014-10-08· cited 20×
- Ranolls v. DewlingE.D. Texas· 2016-09-22· cited 11×
- Finnicum v. Wyeth, Inc.E.D. Texas· 2010-04-28· cited 8×
- Lopez v. HuronCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-02-03· cited 7×
- Note Investment Group, Inc. v. Associates First Capital Corp.E.D. Texas· 2015-03-16· cited 5×
- Yosowitz v. Covidien LPS.D. Texas· 2016-04-25· cited 5×
- Diaz v. Little Remedies Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2011-02-18· cited 3×
- Howard v. Lowe's Home Ctrs., LLCW.D. Texas· 2018-01-26· cited 3×
- DIAZ, DELIRIS v. LITTLE REMEDIES CO., INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2011-02-18
- United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.E.D. Texas· 2015-04-13
Cites
51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Fifth Circuit· 1994-10-26· cited 5,418×
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court· 1947-05-05· cited 2,636×
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court· 1992-06-24· cited 2,631×
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court· 1996-06-26· cited 2,291×
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court· 1982-06-28· cited 1,769×
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 1992-06-08· cited 1,717×
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 1,459×
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 1,390×
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-06-03· cited 1,364×
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-16· cited 1,227×
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1981-05-26· cited 1,191×
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court· 1993-04-21· cited 1,080×
- Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 976×
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court· 2000-05-22· cited 903×
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court· 2008-02-20· cited 735×
- Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court· 1995-07-21· cited 722×
- Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSupreme Court· 1995-04-18· cited 675×
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. DeLanneyTexas Supreme Court· 1991-06-19· cited 670×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.