Mills v. Harmon Law Offices, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing district court’s dismissal of case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rooker-Feldman doctrine
• reiterating that Rooker-Feldman “implicates the court’s subject matter jurisdiction”
• ordering remand even though case appears to have “little future”
• “[T]he point of section 1447(c) is that a federal court does not have the authority to dismiss a claim over which it never had jurisdiction in the first instance. The merits of the ... claim are therefore irrelevant to this determination.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).