Hill v. Town of Conway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rooker-Feldman “forecloses district court jurisdiction of claims that are ‘inextricably intertwined’ with the claims adjudicated in a state court”
• noting that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine precludes review of lower state court opinions, in addition to review of a state’s appellate courts
• stating that a federal claim is “inextricably intertwined” with a state-court claim “if the federal claim succeeds only to the extent that the state court wrongly decided the issues before it.” (quoting Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 481 U.S. 1, 25 (1987

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).