· 11/3/2004
Heghmann v. Indorf (In Re Heghmann)
Citations
- 316 B.R. 395
- 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 1679
- 2004 WL 2453525
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, a bankruptcy court, as a lower federal court, cannot review the final judgment of a state court”
- “actual damages should be awarded only if there is concrete evidence supporting the award of a definite amount”
- “[Actual damages should be awarded only if there is concrete evidence supporting the award of a definite amount.”
- \actual damages should be awarded only if there is concrete evidence supporting the award of a definite amount\
- “[A]ctual damages should be awarded only if there is concrete evidence supporting the award of a definite amount.”
- “actual damages should be awarded only if there is concrete evidence supporting the award of a definite amount”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamoutte, Votolato, Haines
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.