Skip to main content
· 11/3/2004

Heghmann v. Indorf (In Re Heghmann)

Citations

  • 316 B.R. 395
  • 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 1679
  • 2004 WL 2453525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, a bankruptcy court, as a lower federal court, cannot review the final judgment of a state court”
  • “actual damages should be awarded only if there is concrete evidence supporting the award of a definite amount”
  • “[Actual damages should be awarded only if there is concrete evidence supporting the award of a definite amount.”
  • \actual damages should be awarded only if there is concrete evidence supporting the award of a definite amount\
  • “[A]ctual damages should be awarded only if there is concrete evidence supporting the award of a definite amount.”
  • “actual damages should be awarded only if there is concrete evidence supporting the award of a definite amount”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lamoutte, Votolato, Haines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.